Tag: fiction

Book review: Wolves of the Calla by Stephen King (The Dark Tower #5)


Much like Wizard and Glass, Wolves of the Calla feels like the wait at a train station between stops. The story reads like filler for the greater series arc; King pausing to recollect his characters and stop some gaps in a tale than in its writing spanned decades. And by this point you’re entangled enough that you indulge him the sandbox town of Calla Bryn Sturgis and its inhabitants and their secrets, because like Thunderclap darkens the Calla’s horizon, the ending of the series draws near…*

The story follows on the heels of Roland and his ka-tet’s confrontation with the wizard in the previous book. As a gunslinger of old, Roland’s aid is theoretically available to anyone who asks and is deemed worthy of assistance. The Calla, with their children being stolen every two decades or so and their husks sent back, ruined, reluctantly ask him for help, and Roland, Susannah, Eddie, Jake and Oy stay to render assistance in the only way they can: with their guns.

As far as filler goes, it’s not bad. Like I said, at this point you forgive King his dwelling on the town’s inhabitants and their idiosyncrasies. He covers a lot of important ground in a by-the-by sort of way, though, and fans of his will enjoy the return of a character from Salem’s Lot. But if you’re concerned mainly with finishing the series, Wolves of the Calla feels like an unnecessarily long phone call with a slightly delirious uncle: just cut to the chase already!

So, what’s the verdict?

Title: Wolves of the Calla
Author: Stephen King
Publisher: Scribner (1991, 2003)
Rating: 3/5 (Goodreads rating, for comparison: 4.17/5)
The best feature of the book: The Dark Tower series’ plot strings start to pull together more discernibly.
The worst feature of the book: It errs on the self-indulgent.
Trigger warnings: Kids with disabilities. A dash of misogyny. The usual, really.
You’ll like this if… If you’re committed to the series you’ll like it, but if you had to start the series with this book you’d likely never get beyond this book.

*Or so you think. You fool.


Book review: Wizard and Glass by Stephen King (The Dark Tower #4)


I should probably start this review by admitting that after finishing Song of Susannah (The Dark Tower #6) I made the mistake of reading spoilers for The Dark Tower’s ending, and haven’t touched the novels since. I’d heard, years ago, someone describing the series ending as (spoiler alert) “they all go back to the start”. Apparently that’s a very literal summary. Pre-Song of Susannah it didn’t make sense to me, but after finishing the sixth novel in the series it really, really does. But I’m getting ahead of myself.

When I read the series years ago it was Wizard and Glass that proved to be my boredom/offended threshold for King’s The Dark Tower. Roland, not fully committed to his ka-tet the way they are to him, begins Wizard and Glass by telling his friends about the events that led him to seek out The Dark Tower. This involves a lengthy flashback to Roland’s adolescence, his love affair with “girl at the window” Susan Delgado and the things that happened in the small town of Hambry. Roland and his friends had been sent there to keep them safe after Roland’s fateful confrontation with Walter, but Walter and the King he serves have a long reach, and Hambry is not as far removed from danger as Stephen Deschain had hoped.

Wizard and Glass is the emotional gut-punch that, despite your best intentions, finally wins you over to Roland’s side. An ambivalent character for the first three books, erring first on the side of apathy and then becoming more human, Roland’s yarn completes his transformation from “The Gunslinger” to Roland Deschain, son of Stephen, son of Eld. King takes you deep, emotionally, if you can stand the story-world of Hambry and its archaic ways, and the arrogance and youth of adolescent Roland. Unfortunately Susan Delgado, for all King’s attempts to the contrary, stubbornly remains merely “the girl at the window”. It’s a pity because she was an interesting character.

Altogether a decent, if slow, addition to the series. Much of it reads like King was just sitting down and having fun in putting his world and its people together, but he does it well enough that it’s tolerable – at least on the second attempt.

So, what’s the verdict?

Title: Wizard and Glass
Author: Stephen King
Publisher: Scriber (1991, 2003)
Rating: 3/5 (Goodreads rating, for comparison: 4.24/5)
The best feature of the book: King’s great at telling stories, and this book is the story of Roland.
The worst feature of the book: It’s a dull interlude. The pace slackens, and it isn’t really picked up again until Song of Susannah, two books hence.
Trigger warnings: Misogyny in general, nonconsensual sexual contact, teens having at it.
You’ll like this if… If you’ve come this far you won’t need a reason to keep reading.

Book review: The Waste Lands by Stephen King (The Dark Tower #3)


The third book is probably my favourite so far (I’m on book number six, Song of Susannah, at the time of writing this review), though I have my reservations about it. Having drawn first Roland, then the other major characters for the series, the story is more settled and its eventual destination is less up in the air, subject to King’s (often drug or alcohol induced, let’s be honest) whimsy.

The Waste Lands picks up in the forest just beyond the beach Roland found his two companions, Eddie and Susannah, on, three months after Odetta and Detta’s doorway confrontation. Roland has been training Eddie and Susannah in the way of a gunslinger. But all’s not well with Roland: having stopped Jake’s (first) death in the second novel, his mind is tearing itself apart, one part insisting that Jake is dead, and the other insisting that he’s still alive. As the trio find the Path of the Beam, which will lead them to its centre, the Dark Tower, Roland’s condition deteriorates, as does Jake’s back in New York.

Roland, Eddie and Susannah eventually pull Jake back through to their side. The relief of this scene – for some weird reason you want Jake and Roland reunited, although it’s obvious that Roland can’t really be trusted with the welfare of the individual members of their ka-tet, their group – is undercut by what can only be described as a rape, though King plays it like it’s a victory for Susannah (or the Detta part of her, anyway). It sucks. I’ve always thought of King as more or less benign, but the sexual aspects of his fiction often go to dark places and honestly the novel could’ve done without it, though not the series, as we see later.

With Jake (and a bumbler named Oy) completing their ka-tet, the group set off to find Blaine the Mono – a train that could take them across the wastelands and bring them nearer the tower. But first, they have to get through an otherworldly, gang-infested New York called Lud…

So, what’s the verdict?

Title: The Waste Lands
Author: Stephen King
Publisher: Scriber (1991, 2003)
Rating: 3/5 (Goodreads rating, for comparison: 4.24/5)
The best feature of the book: There’s more emotional investment in the characters.
The worst feature of the book: Lud sucks. Blaine sucks.
Trigger warnings: Nonconsensual content of all shades. Evil technology. Hazardous conditions.
You’ll like this if… You, like me, just want to finish the bloody series.

Book review: The Drawing of the Three by Stephen King (The Dark Tower #2)


When I first read these novels more than a decade ago, the only thing that got me past Roland’s betrayal of Jake at the end of The Gunslinger was curiosity about whether Jake would return, and remembering this is what inspired me to keep reading this time around. The Gunslinger doesn’t paint Roland Deschain in the best of light: he cuts a lonely, implacable figure that verges on the sociopathic, and the lack of supporting characters in The Gunslinger make it hard to draw an outsider’s bead on him.

This changes in the second novel in the series. Having tracked down and confronted The Man in Black in the previous novel, Roland wakes up on a beach apparently years after their conversation knowing that he has to “draw” three others to his quest. He sets out to do that, sickening on his journey from an attack by a monster that took most of a hand and a bit of foot, looking for people he knows only as “The Prisoner”, “The Lady in the Shadows” and “Death”…

More human this time round though not always humane, it’s as much a story about a fantastical quest for a tower through foreign worlds than it is about a man finding friendship amid duty and honour.

So, what’s the verdict?

Title: The Drawing of the Three
Author: Stephen King
Publisher: Scribner (1987, 2003)
Rating: 4/5 (Goodreads rating, for comparison: 4.23/5)
The best feature of the book: More characters means more movement, more intrigue, more plot. The Drawing of the Three reads as less self-indulgent than The Gunslinger.
The worst feature of the book: Though I understand King’s characterisation of Detta, the way she’s “othered” as an insane black woman to serve as temporary villain is offensive and to be honest, boring.
Trigger warnings: Racism, casual misogyny, unlikely romance.
You’ll like this if… You’re a fantasy fan or a Stephen King loyalist.

Book review: The Gunslinger by Stephen King (The Dark Tower #1)


Though I was a big Stephen King fan back in high school (a result as much of his books as our limited local library I fear), I’ve never actually finished The Dark Tower series. I zipped through the first three books and started on the fourth, but there was a long flashback and I lost my appetite for it. I’ve been meaning to reread and finish the series ever since, but it wasn’t until its sort-of adaptation loomed in theatres that I actually made good on my intentions.

The Gunslinger picks up Roland Deschain’s quest as he battles his way across a desert in pursuit of The Man in Black, a figure who (in The Gunslinger at least) is part phantom and part prophet – a shadow from the haunt of Roland’s past. Roland, his world’s last gunslinger (think Knight meets cowboy meets king), wants The Man in Black to lead him to the Dark Tower, a tower that stands at the centre of all worlds and holds them all together. Roland’s world is breaking down, and in finding the Tower he hopes to find a cure. But The Man in Black is a cunning enemy and has laid his traps well…

It was interesting to reread The Gunslinger a decade after I read it first. It’s not quite as good as I remember, but I think that’s maybe because ten years on I can better separate my appreciation of King as a writer from his actual work, and his work is often problematic. Reading The Gunslinger and its sequels (at the time of writing this, I’m on novel number five, The Wolves of Calla) it’s pretty hard not to run up against the “wall” of his maleness and even his whiteness, and many of the things I once found charming about his writing now annoy me.

Still, this is Stephen King we’re talking about, one of his generation’s most popular and prolific writers. He’s a storyteller with a passion for his characters, whether those characters take up whole novels or just a paragraph, and his interest in them feeds your own. The Gunslinger plants the seed from which the whole series sprouts: Roland, his ghosts, his loneliness and his stubborn, desperate, hopeless quest to change things the reader suspects are far past changing…

So, what’s the verdict?

Title: The Gunslinger
Author: Stephen King
Publisher: Scribner (1982, 2003)
Rating: 3.5/5 (Goodreads rating, for comparison: 3.99/5)
The best feature of the book: Probably King’s ability to draw in and draw together. Its biggest boon, though, is that it’s very accessible for a fantasy novel: not as remote and dense as high fantasy, but little like his usual fare either.
The worst feature of the book: The unlikely sex scenes.
Trigger warnings: There’s non-consensual sexual contact and murder of varying degrees of violence.
You’ll like this if… You’re a fantasy fan or a Stephen King loyalist.